Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Krause

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1899Published

Appear by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, first district, borough, of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.-

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

Assuming, as is claimed by the plaintiff in this action, that he (plaintiff) was the owner of the property taken under the writ of replevin, by the defendant as .marshal of the city in. the ■action of R. Cohen against Feinberg Brothers, while such property was in the apparent possession of the said defendants in the writ, the plaintiff could only maintain this action by a compliance with the provisions of sections 1709, ltTlO of the Code of Civil Procedure, section 1341- of- the Consolidation Act, and section 1428 of the New York Charter. McCarthy v. Ockerman, 154 N. Y. 565. •

The record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCarthy v. . OckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API