Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Bigelow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 10, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This case is before us upon a writ of certiorari allowed for the purpose of reviewing the action'of the board of adjustment of the city of Newark, which affirmed the action of Frederic Bigelow, superintendent of buildings of the city of Newark, in denying to the prosecutor a permit for the erection of a building to contain apartments and stores at Nos. 75-79 Avon street, in said city. The facts have been agreed upon. The statement of facts shows that David Steinberg, the prosecutor, is the owner in fee-simple of the property known as Nos. 75-79 Avon street, in the city of Newark.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Becker v. DowlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Bismarck v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Rudensey v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API