Backus v. Backus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a decree in equity brought by a deserted wife seeking to have her husband declared trustee for her of his undivided one-half interest in entireties real estate held by the parties. The lower court dismissed her complaint, finding that appellant lacked capacity to sue because of Sections 111 and 114 of the Married Women’s Property Act which prohibit actions seeking to destroy entireties estates prior to termination of *383the marriage. Act of June 8, 1893, P.L. 344, § 3, 48 P.S. § 111; Act of May 1, 1913, P.L. 146, § 1, 48 P.S. § 114.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Holmes EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Martine v. Cipa (In Re Cipa)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.