Legal Opinion

Backus v. Backus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1975No. 9PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree in equity brought by a deserted wife seeking to have her husband declared trustee for her of his undivided one-half interest in entireties real estate held by the parties. The lower court dismissed her complaint, finding that appellant lacked capacity to sue because of Sections 111 and 114 of the Married Women’s Property Act which prohibit actions seeking to destroy entireties estates prior to termination of *383the marriage. Act of June 8, 1893, P.L. 344, § 3, 48 P.S. § 111; Act of May 1, 1913, P.L. 146, § 1, 48 P.S. § 114.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Holmes EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Martine v. Cipa (In Re Cipa)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API