Legal Opinion

Russell v. Bukowski

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 24, 2015No. 14-3667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Mike Russell, a pretrial detainee in Illinois, sued corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they failed- to protect him from attack by a fellow inmate. A magistrate judge, trying the case by consent, ruled that the defendants were not liable. Because the credibility findings and discretionary rulings are proper, we affirm.

*427This case concerns a fight between Russell and another inmate at the Kankakee County Detention Center. The Center was Russell’s third pretrial location because, fearing gang members, he had twice requested protective custody and received new housing.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. David Brown v. Timothy BudzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. VosburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knox v. KershawDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
  2. Presley v. VillarealDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Schaefer v. SpatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API