Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Aberdeen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 17, 1972No. 578-2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant, the City of Aberdeen, appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict for the plaintiff, Wilma Smith, in the sum of $14,000 for personal injuries.

The appeal raises two issues: (1) Was the plaintiff’s evidence sufficient to support the verdict? (2) Did the trial court properly instruct the jury? We find the evidence sufficient, but the instructions improper.

At about 10 p.m. on April 23, 1969, Mrs. Smith was walking down Park Street in the city of Aberdeen. She had never before walked on this particular sidewalk. She tripped on a 1-inch offset in the sidewalk and fell. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Grass v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Blasick v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Crowley v. BartoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Argus v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. McKee v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. de Mello v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API