Legal Opinion
Teaneck Board of Education v. Teaneck Teachers Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 18, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
94 N.J. 9 (1983)
462 A.2d 137
TEANECK BOARD OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENT,
v.
TEANECK TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 18, 1983.
Decided July 18, 1983.
Sheldon H. Pincus argued the cause for appellant (Bucceri & Pincus, attorneys).
James P. Granello argued the cause for respondent (Murray & Granello, attorneys; Robert T. Lawless, on the brief).
Robert E. Anderson, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, argued the cause for Public Employment Relations Commission.
Susan L. Reisner, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Handler; Concurrence · Handler.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Ridgefield Park Education Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.