Legal Opinion

Aspinwall v. Enterprise Development Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1927No. 5608PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. If an owner of a tract of land divides it into lots, streets, and alleys, records a plat thereof, and conveys lots by reference to the plat which abuts a particular alley, the grantee in virtue of the grant will acquire a private easement in the alley as appurtenant to the land for the purpose of affording ingress and egress to and from the lots. Bayard v. Hargrove, 45 Ga. 342; Ford v. Harris, 95 Ga. 97 (22 S. E. 144); Murphy v. Harker, 115 Ga. 77 (41 S. E. 585); Hamil v. Pone, 160 Ga. 774 (129 S. E. 94). The principle applies whether the alley extends from one street to another or is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ford v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Murphey v. HarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Bayard v. HargroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Schreck v. BlunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Ashford v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Owens Hardware Co. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Rogers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Hames v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API