Aspinwall v. Enterprise Development Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. If an owner of a tract of land divides it into lots, streets, and alleys, records a plat thereof, and conveys lots by reference to the plat which abuts a particular alley, the grantee in virtue of the grant will acquire a private easement in the alley as appurtenant to the land for the purpose of affording ingress and egress to and from the lots. Bayard v. Hargrove, 45 Ga. 342; Ford v. Harris, 95 Ga. 97 (22 S. E. 144); Murphy v. Harker, 115 Ga. 77 (41 S. E. 585); Hamil v. Pone, 160 Ga. 774 (129 S. E. 94). The principle applies whether the alley extends from one street to another or is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ford v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Murphey v. HarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Bayard v. HargroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Schreck v. BlunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Ashford v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Owens Hardware Co. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Rogers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Hames v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.