Hudgins v. Schultice
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from G-arland Chancery Court; Jethro P. Henderson, Chancellor; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This suit was brought by appellees against appellant to redeem 'certain lots in tbe city of Hot Springs from tbe appellant, the purchaser, at the sale foreclosing a lien for improvement district taxes due thereon.
Read the full summary
Appeal from G-arland Chancery Court; Jethro P. Henderson, Chancellor; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This suit was brought by appellees against appellant to redeem 'certain lots in tbe city of Hot Springs from tbe appellant, the purchaser, at the sale foreclosing a lien for improvement district taxes due thereon. Lottie Schultice had formerly, been collector of Improvement District No. 24, in which the lots are situated, and was on October 16, 1911, .at the time of the bringing of the suit to foreclose the lien and collect the taxes the sole owner of the lots. On March 13,1912, she executed a…
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The sole question for decision is whether the purchaser at the sale for the foreclosure of the lien for the improvement taxes after the year allowed for redemption had. expired, can hold the property against grantees .and mortgagees, bona fide purchasers to whom conveyances were made by defendant after the suit for foreclosure was commenced, and no lis pendens notice filed as required by section 5149, Kirby’s Digest. Appellant insists that notwithstanding no lis pendens notice was filed, and said purchasers and mortgagees had no actual notice of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dow v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Henry Wrape Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Hobbs v. LenonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Oil Fields Corporation v. DashkoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Jones v. AinellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Wilkins v. Jernigan, Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.