Legal Opinion

Hannon Armstrong & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1992No. Nos. 91-2658, 91-2662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Sumitomo Trust & Banking Company appeals the district court’s determination on remand of the amount of the profits which the bank obtained by engaging in a certain transaction in violation of an agreement not to compete, and which the Fourth Circuit determined should therefore be placed in constructive trust for the benefit of Ap-pellee Hannon Armstrong. Hannon Armstrong cross-appeals. As explained below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.

I

This is an appeal of the district court’s disposition on remand of our previous…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Snepp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Boyd Wanzer, and Kathleen ZampieriCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Rahman v. Oncology Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hitachi Credit America Corp. v. Signet BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Exxonmobil Oil Corp. v. Black Stone Petroleum Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  4. Key Government Finance, Inc. v. E3 Enterprises Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  5. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API