Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Piggyback service — the movement of highway trailers on railroad flatcars — constitutes “probably the most significant recent development in transportation”, in the opinion of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Because of the “explosive growth” of this service in the past five years, the Commission in 1962 instituted on its own motion a proceeding to investigate the subject generally and “to explore new approaches” to its regulation. That proceeding culminated in a Report and Order of the Commission issued under the title Substituted Service — Charges and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Maurer v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida East Coast Railway Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1966
- Farley Terminal Company, Inc. v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Harold Willinger, Doing Business as Assembly Consolidators, Plaintiff v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- New York Central Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.