Legal Opinion

Harish v. Raj

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1996No. A96A0804PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Drs. Gorli Harish, D. M. Jayaram and Ujjal Sandhu (collectively “plaintiffs”) sued Ranjan Raj and Gurubasava Raj (collectively “defendants”), alleging defendants fraudulently conspired to obtain their shares of Universal Business Partners, Inc. (“Universal”) for significantly less than its true market value in violation of the Georgia RICO statute (OCGA § 16-14-1 et seq.). The complaint also alleged fraud and deceit and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendants, finding (1) defendants did not owe a fiduciary duty to plaintiffs since they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kienel v. LanierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Charles v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  4. Southern Intermodal Logistics, Inc. v. Smith & Kelly Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Cohen v. William Goldberg & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. Hub Cap Heaven, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Williams v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Wender & Roberts, Inc. v. WenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Gibbs v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API