Legal Opinion

Nordby Supply Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1978No. 77-2059PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States appeals from a judgment in favor of the Nordby Supply Co. (Nordby), finding Nordby entitled to a refund of $2,714.25 for taxes paid. We reverse and remand.

Nordby imported and sold fishing lures under the trade name “Husky”. The lures were packaged without hooks in groups of ten. Each package was marked “Designed and Sold for Commercial Fishing Only”. In all other respects, the lures were identical to lures used in recreational fishing. Commercial fishermen purchased 80% of these lures.

Nordby paid the excise tax imposed on importers and manufacturers of fishing lures under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commerce-Pacific, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Robert Sheldon Pike and Ryk Henry Brouwer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Washington Mut. Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc. v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Nelson-Ricks Creamery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. National Center For Immigrants' Rights, Inc. v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API