Legal Opinion

McCausland v. Tide-Mayflower Mov. & Storage

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 14, 1986No. 85-395PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, John and Shirley McCausland, filed a complaint in the Mobile Circuit Court against the defendants, Tide-Mayflower Moving and Storage ("Tide") and Aero Mayflower Transit Company ("Aero") in October 1985. The complaint alleged causes of action in detinue, conversion, breach of contract, and fraud. In September 1985, Aero and Tide moved for summary judgment on all counts. This motion was granted in November 1985. The McCauslands appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The standard for summary judgment is well-settled and was stated in Silk v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Fountain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Butler v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API