Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Fruit Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 17, 1964No. Nos. 460-56 and 568-57Published

1Dissent

Reed, Justice (Ret.),

sitting by designation, dissenting:

Although the burden need not be carried by precise methods of proof, it falls upon the plaintiff to establish a reasonable basis for determining the amount due.1 While neither records of the weight of empty air mail sack shipments on plaintiff’s boats for the period in question, nor a separate tariff for empty air mail sacks exists, it seems to me a reasonable approximation of the service rendered can be reached from the facts in the record.

To reach the closest approximation of a fair charge I would remand to the Commissioner with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United Fruit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. United Fruit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API