Legal Opinion

Hutto v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 20, 1908No. 7062PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Orangeburg, October, 1907. Action by J. D. Hutto against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Plaintiff having no permission to use house cannot recover under statute: 77 S. C., 467. No evidence of negligence in running the train: 34 S. C., 444; 7 S. C., 403; 58 S. C., 491; 103 Pa., 435; 30 N. J. L., 188; 19 L. R. A., 563; 34 At., 341; 3 L R. A., 778. Bmitting sparks is not an element of negligence: 34 S. C., 366;…

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Orangeburg, October, 1907. Action by J. D. Hutto against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Plaintiff having no permission to use house cannot recover under statute: 77 S. C., 467. No evidence of negligence in running the train: 34 S. C., 444; 7 S. C., 403; 58 S. C., 491; 103 Pa., 435; 30 N. J. L., 188; 19 L. R. A., 563; 34 At., 341; 3 L R. A., 778. Bmitting sparks is not an element of negligence: 34 S. C., 366; 38 S. C., 103; 49 L. R. A., 645; 15 Wall, 534. Messrs. Raysor & Summers cite: Liability under the statute attaches…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

In this action plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for $507.15 as damages for destruction of a lot of cotton seed by fire communicated thereto by one of defendant’s locomotive engines.

1 The first contention presented by defendant’s exceptions to this judgment is whether the Court erred in holding that the complaint was under the common law and not under the statute, sec. 3135 Code of Laws.

The complaint after alleging the incorporation of the defendant, that it operated the railroad at the time of the fire, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. German-American Insurance v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Gregory v. LaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. McLeod v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Baker v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. Birt v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API