Legal Opinion

State v. Phathammavong

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 7, 1993No. 920342-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based upon his right to a speedy trial. We affirm.

FACTS

In July 1991, defendant was charged with aggravated assault for acts committed in June 1991. Thereafter, defendant was arrested and imprisoned because these alleged acts violated his probation on a previous conviction. On September 19, 1991, defendant signed a Notice and Request for Disposition of Pending Charges (“Request”), asserting his right to a speedy trial within 120 days. That same day, defendant gave the Request to his caseworker, Lynette…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. White v. Kent Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. James v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. AmbroseUtah Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Coleman Ex Rel. Schefski v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BlubaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API