State v. Zimmerman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant has numerous assignments of error. First, defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing Officer Fuller to frequently characterize 604 Barnes Avenue as defendant’s “house” or “place of residence.” The record discloses a number of occasions in which defendant did not object to such a characterization. It is the well established rule that when evidence is admitted over objection but the same evidence has theretofore or thereafter been admitted without objection, the benefit of the objection is ordinarily lost. State v. Owens, 277 N.C. 697, 178 S.E. 2d 442 (1971).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BagnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Amusements of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.