Claim of Stanick v. Seiberling Rubber Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
An employer and its carrier appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which discharged the Special Fund under subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant, employed to change the heavy tires of large automotive trucks, sustained an industrial injury on October 19, 1951 for which a schedule award of 17%% loss of use of the left foot was made. On March 8,1954 while in the same employ he sustained a second injury which resulted in the amputation of a substantial part of the same member and an ensuing award based on a 99% loss of its use, followed by…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of O'Grady v. Sealright Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- McCarver v. Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986