Legal Opinion
Pacific Improvement Co. v. Chattanooga Southern R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Georgia
Decided March 31, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Suit by tbe Pacific Improvement Company against the Chattanooga Southern Railroad Company, in which Henry R. Ramb filed an intervening petition for an allowance against defendant for compensation for services rendered as its president. Demurrer to intervention, as amended, sustained.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
Henry R. Ramb filed his intervening petition in this case, asking to be allowed to recover against the company compensation for services rendered as its president. The original petition is as follows:
“Tn compliance with the decree rendered in the above-styled cause, Henry L. Damb, by his attorney, Norris Headrick, respectfully shows to the court that lie is, and continuously has been since the year 1893, president of the defendant railroad company, and, as such president, he has rendered and continues to render valuable services to said company; that he has never at any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- City of Danville v. Danville Water Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Ellis v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Merrick v. Peru Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Henry Wood's Sons Co. v. SchaeferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brampton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Brampton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930