Schnull v. Cuddy
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Floyd Circuit Court; W. O. Utz, Judge. Action by Henry Sehnull and others against Emmett Cuddy. From a judgment for plaintiffs for less than their demand, they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
Appellants brought this action against the appellee to recover damages for the breach of a contract to sell to them 2,000 cases of tomatoes during the packing season of 1901. The first and second paragraphs of the complaint were filed April 12, 1902. October 7, 1902, appellants filed an affidavit for attachment and garnishment, naming the Van Camp Packing Company as gar*263nishee defendant, and attaching $1,805.76 belonging to the appellee. Appellee answered the first and second paragraphs of the complaint in three paragraphs, the first being a general denial. The second and third paragraphs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carver v. LouthainIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Wood v. WackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Froman v. RousIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by1 opinion
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927