Legal Opinion

Testman v. Roman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a family offense *720proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Julio C. Roman appeals from (1) an order of protection of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), dated September 17, 2009, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court, also dated September 17, 2009, which, after a hearing, upon a finding that he had committed certain family offenses, directed him to observe the conditions of the order of protection.

Ordered that the order of protection and the order are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the factual allegations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kraus v. KrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Luke v. LukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Nusbaum v. NusbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Amy SS. v. John SS.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Holder v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Little v. RenzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Matter of Xin Li v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Del Canto v. BehrensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Lamparillo v. LamparilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. McFadden v. McFaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API