Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Reconditioned Office Systems of Colorado, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1994No. 93CA0064PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge VAN CISE. *
In this action to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiff, Frank Wilcox, appeals from an order of the trial court denying his motion to amend and supplement his complaint after default judgment had been entered against defendant Reconditioned Office Systems of Colorado, Inc., (ROSCO) and denying his motion to compel payment of garnishment funds. We affirm.
Wilcox’s claims are based on a contract with ROSCO involving the lease and installation of equipment used to display his work in an art show. In early 1988, Wilcox held a showing of his photographic works…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Roderick D. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Robert Czeremcha v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,800 Gordon F. B. Ondis v. Fred H. Barrows, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Cooper v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Eagle River Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of EagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wisehart v. Zions BancorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Davis v. PaolinoColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- v. DIA Brewing CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Estate of Hays ex rel. Hays v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.