Legal Opinion

Gastelum v. Hegyi

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 30, 2015No. 1 CA-SA 14-0204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 In State v. Sema, 235 Ariz. 270, 331 P.3d 405 (2014), the supreme court established a new rule limiting some Terry stops to those occasions when officers reasonably suspect that criminal activity is afoot and that an individual is armed and dangerous. This special action arises out of the superior court’s order denying Humberto Gastelum’s motion to suppress contraband discovered during a Terry frisk. Gastelum contends that because police did not have reason to believe he was both armed and dangerous, they did not have legal grounds to frisk him. We hold that the Serna…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. WinegarArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrissetteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. State v. CogerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. State v. DazenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API