Legal Opinion

Teamsters, Local 117 v. Northwest Beverages, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 24, 1999No. 42386-0-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

— The Teamsters appeal from an order dismissing their members’ claims for payment of unused sick leave at the termination of employment with Northwest Beverages. They rely on the statutory requirement that an employer must pay a terminated employee the “wages due him on account of his employment.” We hold that accrued sick leave is a contingent benefit that does not constitute wages under this statute unless it is so defined by another source. The judgment below is affirmed.

The facts are not in dispute. The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the employees and Northwest Beverages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. TrulockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. NACHES VLY. SCH. DIST. v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Naches Valley School District No. JT3 v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Southeastern Washington Building & Construction Trades Council v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Christian v. County of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Loves v. World Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Backman v. Northwest Publishing Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. LOVES v. World Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. William Sornsin v. Scout Media Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API