Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baker Industries, Inc. v. Cerberus Limited. Appeal of Cravath, Swaine & Moore

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 16, 1985No. 84-5197Published

1Dissent

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

I part company with the majority because I am of the opinion that, under any view of the proceedings below, the record does not sustain an inference of the type of unreasonable and vexatious conduct which calls 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (1982) into play.

While the trial judge was understandably exasperated by the procedural complications presented by Cravath, Swaine and Moore’s (“Cravath”) multitudinous objections to Baker’s motion for entry of judgment on the Master’s report, and obviously perturbed by what was perceived as an attempt by Cravath to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. CridenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API