Legal Opinion

Rasinski v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The action is based on a policy of automobile accident insurance dated June 4th, 1930, issued by the defendant-respondent in favor of one Teofil Halecki (not to be confused with plaintiffs Halecka). Halecki, the assured, was driving the three plaintiffs in his ear as invited guests, on October ftli, 1930, when there was an accident and the plaintiffs were injured. They sued Halecki in the Union County Common Pleas, and recovered judgment. The respondent company at first undertook to defend for its assured, but later withdrew on the ground of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  3. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API