Legal Opinion

Evers v. Dimino

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.

This is an application for an order pursuant to sections 123 and 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law to permanently enjoin the respondents Kovac and Dimino from engaging in the retail sale of liquor for off-premises consumption at 31-92 30th Street, and 32-09 34th Street, both in Astoria, Queens County. Petitioner also seeks an order commanding the respondents constituting the State Liquor Authority (hereinafter referred to as the authority) to revoke and cancel licenses heretofore issued for the operation of liquor package stores at said addresses.

The Legislature has delegated to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Evers v. FlanaganNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Kramer v. PearsonNew York Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stefco Realty Corp. v. CommerdingerNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API