Legal Opinion
Denick v. Hubbard
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1882Published
Appeal from a judgment, entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the defendant, at the Oswego Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Haight, J.:
This action is founded upon the following promissory note:
“ Hannibal, April 28, 1877.
“On the twentieth day of March next, for value received, I promise to pay Reuben Terpening, or bearer, eighty-two dollars, with use.
(Signed.) . “ W. B. HUBBARD.
“HENRY JAMES.
“ S. B. TERPENING. “REUBEN TERPENING.”
The note was originally executed by Henry James and S. B. Terpening, and delivered to Reuben Terpening, the payee. Reuben Terpening signed his name under that of S. B. Terpening, and transferred the note to the defendant, William B. Hubbard; William B. Hubbard subsequently transferred the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Real Estate Trust Company v. . KeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Halliday v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- McCaughey v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Cobb v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Hunt v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.