Hahn v. State

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction of burglary with the lowest penalty assessed appellant prosecutes an appeal.

There are but few questions raised. One of these is appellant claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We have carefully read and studied the evidence. It is circumstantial. We are not only • thoroughly convinced from a study of it that it. is sufficient to sustain the conviction, but from it no other reasonable conclusion could he reached than of the appellant’s guilt.' We think it is unnecessary to recite the evidence. It is quite lengthy. The…