Legal Opinion

Willett v. Chu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The primary issue on this appeal is whether petitioner’s occupation, which consists of consulting in the fields of public relations and food service, is a profession within the meaning of the now-repealed unincorporated business tax. Respondents determined that her activities did not fall within the exemption for professionals provided by Tax Law former § 703 (c) (repealed by L 1978, ch 69, §§ 7, 30) and thus assessed her $424.69 plus interest for the year 1975. We conclude that this determination is supported by substantial evidence.

This court has stated that the criteria for determining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tripp v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Cissley v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Classic Pools, Inc. v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Sheahan v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willett v. DuganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Wexler v. New York State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API