Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Colvin
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 12, 2016No. Civil No. 16-154-ARTPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Amul R. Thapar, United States District Judge
If the government threw Amy Jo Hicks in jail because she was a member of A1 Qaeda, she would get a chance to challenge that factual assertion before a neutral arbiter. See Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 533, 124 S.Ct. 2633, 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004). If the government fired her because she lied on an employment form, she would get a chance to challenge that factual assertion before a neutral arbiter. See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 544, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). And if the government…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Justiniano v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Gary Kirk v. Commissioner of SSACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Kirk v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Melisa Ingram v. Wayne County, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Adams v. SSADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.