Legal Opinion
Beuttas v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 5, 1944No. 44978Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 F.Supp. 771 (1944)
BEUTTAS et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 44978.
Court of Claims.
June 5, 1944.
P. J. J. Nicolaides, of Washington, D. C. (William F. Kelly, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Donald B. MacGuineas, of Washington, D. C., and Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
Before WHALEY, Chief Justice and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, JONES, and MADDEN, Judges.
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiffs sue to recover extra costs incurred due to a suspension of the work for 69 days during which a change in the plans and specifications was being considered. It is stipulated that they are…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.