Legal Opinion

Geer v. Cowart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 25, 1908No. 1184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Miller county — Judge Bush. February 25, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. In this State the statutory right of set-off is confined to demands or claims of a similar nature; and a claim arising ex delicto can not he set off against a claim arising ex contractu. Civil Code, §§4944, 3996; Ingram v. Jordan, 55 Ga. 356; Smith v. Printup, 59 Ga. 610.

2. Except as above limited, the right of set-off, if it exists, is purely an equitable right, cognizable only in a court of equity jurisdiction.. Hecht v. Snook, 114 Ga. 923 (41 S. E. 74).

3. The superior courts of this State have exclusive jurisdiction in equity-causes. Civil Code, §5842.

4. The city court of Miller county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Smith, Son & Brother v. Printup Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  3. Ingram v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Edenfield v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Jones v. George S. Riley Jr. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Autry v. PalmourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Fuller v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. McArthur v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API