United States v. Lavenson
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Equity. Suit by the United States against Albert. S. Lavenson and Jane Doe Lavenson, his wife, and the Whatcom County Railway & Light Company.
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
This suit is now for determination, after evidence taken. It was brought, asking cancellation of a patent heretofore issued by the United States to one E. C. Baird for certain mining claims situated in Whatcom county in the Mt. Baker mining district; the claims being known as “Rattler,” “Mermaid,” “Rising Current,” “White Rapids,” “Placid Water,” and “Clear Water.”
The grounds upon which the title is asked fi> be restored to the United States are that the ’alleged mining claims never did contain any valuable mineral deposits, nor any veins or lodes of quartz or other…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Palmer v. Dredge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- No. 21435Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Nos. 21435, 21436Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968