Legal Opinion

D'Orazio v. Masciantonio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1942No. Appeal, 173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Maxey,

This action was instituted by a scire facias sur mortgage. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendant (as it did also in a former trial of the same action). Plaintiff made a motion for judgment n. o. v. which was granted. The court also entered a decree that “no execution issue on the judgment until the expiration of six months from the date of the decree.” This appeal followed.

The mortgage on which the writ issued was given by Antonio Masciantonio and his wife, Giuditta, to two mortgagees bearing respectively the same names as the mortgagors. The mortgage was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Von BonnhorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. Wilker v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Harrison v. AtleeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Rhone v. Keystone Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Spagnol Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn Lear Development Corp. (In Re Spagnol Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Diehl v. Council of Zion Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API