Department of Revenue v. Croslin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Taxpayers appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court. The tax court determined that, because taxpayers’ position in the magistrate division was frivolous, ORS 305.437, which we quote below, obligated the magistrate to award damages to the Department of Revenue (department) and that the magistrate had erred in declining to do so. The tax court also determined that taxpayers’ position on appeal in that court was frivolous. Accordingly, the tax court awarded damages to the department under ORS 305.437 on the basis of taxpayers’ position in both divisions. The tax court also awarded attorney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Berger v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Comcast Corp. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Jimenez v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Negrete v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090028d (or.tax 6-12-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.