Noblesville Business Men's Ass'n v. Capital Furniture Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Hamilton Circuit Court, James M. Purvis, Special Judge. Action between The Noblesville Business Men’s Assoeiatipn and The Capital Furniture Manufacturing Company. Prom a judgment for the latter, the former appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, C. J.
This appeal is based on the following “assignment of errors” in this court: “The appellant says there is manifest error in the judgment and proceedings in the cause, in the following: (1) The court erred in sustaining appellee’s motion for permission to withdraw the request for special finding of facts and conclusions of law thereon. (2) The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.”
The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the following grounds: “(1) For failure on the part of the appellant to comply with Rule No. 3 in the preparation of its transcript in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. MotsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Bingham v. StageIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Stumph v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Emison v. ShepardIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Coxe Bros. & Co. v. FoleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Surface Combustion Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Coxe Bros. & Co. v. FoleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914