Matia Contractors, Inc. v. City of Bellingham
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Dwyer, A.C.J.
¶1 In Wilson v. City of Seattle, 122 Wn.2d 814, 863 P.2d 1336 (1993), the Supreme Court decided that the claim-filing requirements of chapter 4.96 RCW apply only to tort claims. In Harberd v. City of Kettle Falls, 120 Wn. App. 498, 84 P.3d 1241 (2004), Division Three of this court — without distinguishing or even mentioning Wilson — decided that the claim-filing requirements of chapter 4.96 RCW apply to all claims for money damages, not just to claims sounding in tort. In this case, the trial court dismissed Matia Contractors, Inc.’s breach of contract action against the city of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Fast v. Kennewick Pub. Hosp. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2016