Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 1982No. AL-320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Arnett appeals Florida Parole and Probation Commission action establishing his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

There is no ex post facto violation in applying the matrix in effect at the time of interview when the crime was committed prior to enactment of parole guidelines, Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982).

The sufficiency of the notice given…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. FLA. PAROLE & PROB. COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Overfield v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Britt v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Canter v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'SHAUGHNESSY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API