Legal Opinion
Peron Restaurant Inc. v. Young & Rubicam Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*470Although the court’s failure to direct the filing of an undertaking does not render its Yellowstone injunction void, the matter is remitted to the IAS court to fix an undertaking, unless the parties stipulate to an amount (see, Times Sq. Stores Corp. v Bernice Realty Co., 107 AD2d 677, 681). Since the court’s order of March 29, 1991 failed to conform strictly to the court’s decision of January 25, 1991 concerning the commencement of the stay, the decision controls (Di Prospero v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 479), and the court should have resettled the March order when defendant moved to vacate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Di Prospero v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Times Square Stores Corp. v. Bernice Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Berg v. DimsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Goldberg v. OrzacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Goldberg v. OrzacNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cohn v. White Oak Cooperative Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Sportsplex of Middletown, Inc. v. Catskill Regional Off-Track Betting CorporationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- 51 Park Place LH, LLC v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 2011
- Ishaq v. BatraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- New York City Constr., Inc. v. Morgenstern Bros. Realty Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2016