Coffee v. Coleman
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the chancery court of Lauderdale county. LIon. Stone Deavours, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtCalhoon, J.
The bill is to confirm a tax title, is good on its face, and exhibits, as part of it, two conveyances from the tax collector which are in statutory form, and are by law prima facie evidence of the validity of the assessment and sale. Code 1892, §§ 1806, 3817. We are not favored with any brief for appellee, but suppose thé demurrer was argued and sustained on the ground that, because the tax conveyances recite that the assessment was for the year 1890, the court had to assume that it was made under the act of March 8, 1888 (Laws 1888, p. 24, ch. 9), commonly known as the “Madison act,” which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hawkins v. MangumMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
- Butts v. RicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. W. Denny & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Eastland v. Yazoo Delta Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Mitchell v. TubbMississippi Supreme Court · 1914