Legal Opinion

Hartzog v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 14, 1997No. CR-96-1738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Wade Allen Hartzog, appeals from the circuit court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., in which he attacked his 1995 conviction for first-degree possession of marijuana. The appellant's conviction was affirmed by this Court in an unpublished memorandum. Hartzog v. State, 687 So.2d 225 (Ala.Cr.App. 1996) (table).

On August 27, 1997, the appellant filed the present Rule 32 petition, alleging (1) that his sentence was excessive; (2) that the trial judge made prejudicial statements that "tainted the fairness of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Payne v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Mock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API