Ocasio v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM2
Alexander Ocasio appeals pro se the summary judgment of the district court in his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We review summary judgment de novo. Baker v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 143 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir.1998). Because Ocasio failed to respond to defendant’s requests for admissions, the district court properly deemed the matters admitted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 36(a) and, in the absence of any disputed issues of material fact, properly granted summary judgment. See O’Campo v. Hardisty, 262 F.2d 621, 623-24…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florence O'CampO v. Edna Hardisty, Paul H. Wright, R. v. Rushford, N. P. Hughes and N. DrakulichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Paul BAKER; Heidi Baker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aulakh v. Crane Worldwide Logistics LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Petros v. DuncanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Smith-Thomas v. Home Depot USA IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025