Legal Opinion

Scheinkman v. Scheinkman

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by the plaintiff for alimony and counsel fee.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The defendant sets up the fact that there is in existence a separation agreement between him and the plaintiff as parties of the first and second parts and one Michel Bernstein, as trustee for the plaintiff, as party of the third part, by the terms of which the sum of $3,800 annually in equal half monthly installments is to be paid'by him for the support and maintenance of the plaintiff and her children. On behalf of the defendant the point is made that the wife’s remedy is an action for specific performance of the agreement; or, if it is unfair or inequitable or was *444fraudulently obtained, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Pignatelli v. PignatelliNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ryskind v. RyskindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API