People ex rel. King v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Mandamus. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Axel Chytbaus, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom
The controversy in the case at har is in all respects, both of law and fact, analogous to the case of People ex rel. McKenna v. City of Chicago, 127 Ill. App. 118, and what was there said is equally decisive of this case. It has the further' analogy of having been decided by the same learned judge sitting at nisi prius.
King was a policeman of the city of Chicago, put upon the force under civil service procedure, and after due notice and a hearing before the Civil Service Commission, on charges duly made, was on February 23, 1904, removed 'from the police department for violation of Rule 67.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Clark v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- People ex rel. Kisselberg v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Ashley v. PiersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Ballinger v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- People ex rel. Holty v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- People ex rel. McSweeney v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.