Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Suero
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 17, 2013PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, C.J.
We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review limited to whether the defendant’s conviction of indecent assault and battery on a child under the *216age of fourteen years, in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 13B, was duplicative of his conviction of rape of a child under the age of sixteen years, in violation of G. L. c. 265, § 23 (statutory rape).1 In an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court concluded that the charges were not duplicative, and affirmed the convictions. Commonwealth v. Suero, 81 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (2012). Because we…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. St. PierreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Kuklis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SelavkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. DykensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.