Moody & Perkins v. Stephenson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
WRIT OP ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP RAMSEY COUNTY. This was a motion to dismiss the writ of Error issued in the above-entitled cause, upon the ground that an appeal had already been taken thereon.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Oov/rt.
Chatfield, J.
Stephenson, the Defendant in Error, recovered judgment in the District Court against Moody & Perkins, and they appealed to this Court. After the Appeal was taken, Stephenson sought to enforce the judgment notwithstanding the Appeal, by a compliance with the provisions of section 18 of chapter 81 of the Revised Statutes. Moody & Perkins then sued out a writ of Error upon the judgment, and gave the necessary security to effect a Supersedeas. Upon this state of facts, the Defendant in Error moves to dismiss the writ of Error, and for judgment for costs. The question…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Sampson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Palms v. Shawano CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Gould v. WiseNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.