Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Tomahawk Manufacturing

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 28, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00880Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES B. WOLFF, Case No. 3:21-cv-880-SI Plaintiff, TENTATIVE ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE v. TOMAHAWK MANUFACTURING, INC., Defendant. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff James B. Wolff (“Wolff”) has sued his former employer, Defendant Tomahawk Manufacturing, Inc. (“Tomahawk”). After the Court’s earlier rulings, what remains for trial are five claims asserted by Wolff and one counterclaim asserted by Tomahawk. Wolff’s first claim alleges breach of contract. Wolff contends that he and Tomahawk had a non-disclosure agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. McConnell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. United States v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API