Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1920No. 1569Published

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

This suit was brought by R. S. Palmer and E. Brooks against H. W. Armstrong and the First National Bank of Tulia *628to recover tlie sum of $1,000, agreed liquidated damages for the breach of a contract between Palmer and Armstrong for the sale of a section of land by Palmer and purchase thereof by the said Armstrong. Trial before a jury resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs.

E. Brooks, a real estate agent at Tulia, was employed by the plaintiff Palmer to sell the section of land for a stated sum of money, which was to be paid partly in cash, partly in the assumption of certain notes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hollifield v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Hill v. ConradTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Clifton v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API