Legal Opinion

Howard v. Krull

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 9, 2020No. 2:19-cv-12501Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JORDAN HOWARD, CIVIL DOCKET Plaintiff VERSUS NO. 19-12501 SANDRA KRULL, ET AL., SECTION: “E” (2) Defendants ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process filed by Defendant Sandra Krull pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5).1 Plaintiff opposes the motion.2 Krull filed a reply.3 BACKGROUND On July 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a petition for damages against Defendants Krull, EAN Holdings, LLC, and Ace American Insurance Company in the 40th Judicial District Court for the Parish…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Aetna Business Credit, Inc. v. Universal Decor & Interior Design, Inc., Gary L. Kemp and Sharon L. KempCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Rufus M. Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Charles A. George v. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Heredia v. Transport S.A.S., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API